Category: Character Enneagrams

GROOT, NINE

His relationship with Rocket indicates he’s a Nine, but let’s look at him in more detail.

Even though he’s a monosyllabic tree, he definitely fits the definition of Body Type. He’s quite competent as a superhero fighter, growing limbs and using his strength. He’s so cheerful about knocking people about with his extra-long arms.

He and Rocket are a symbiotic duo. Groot doesn’t have to be smart; Rocket is the brain. Rocket doesn’t have to be nice; Groot is the diplomat. In real life I’d want to break these two apart so each could grow the weaker side of their personality. Since they’re comic book characters, though, they are wonderful together. They literally speak a language only known to them.

Without this relationship, would I be able to identify Groot’s Enneagram? I doubt it. That they travel together is key. Their interaction is beautifully written and conceived.

ROCKET, SIX

He loves practical jokes. An elaborate plan to break the team out of prison includes a request, straight-faced, for an artificial leg that has no purpose beyond being funny. What commitment!

He’s deeply insecure. Is that a trait intrinsic to his Enneagram, or is it a product of the abuse he’s suffered as a lab experiment? He’s a Head Type; an ingenious wizard in the body of a raccoon. Anybody would feel less-than under those circumstances.

Five, Six, or Seven? Well, hilariously, I immediately discount him as a Five because he’s so short. It’s not his fault! He’s a small animal!

He’s so dour he must be a Six. A Six can be very glass-half-empty, and that’s Rocket. Disaster is always around the corner for him. His love of Groot — a Nine if ever there was one — is also very Six. A Six moves to Nine in strength, and what raccoon wouldn’t dream of being a powerful tree, lol? Their partnership, I would suggest, is based in this Enneagram relationship.

Rocket is the darkest version of a Six possible, which is rooted in his lab-animal history, but we still get his cutting humor, his crafty intelligence, and his tender heart. Well done.

LADY JESSICA (2021), SIX

This movie doesn’t explain why Jessica chooses to birth a son rather than daughters as the Bene Gesserit expects. I remember the book, though. (I think, lol.) She loves Duke Leto and wants him to have a son (the patri-lineal monarchy), someone like him, and someone special (if he is indeed the Kwisatz Haderach). Family and love, mothering, are everything to her. This Jessica is very much played with this intention. Ferguson kills it, bringing so much depth to these emotions.

Like Paul, this Jessica is more emotional than the Lynchian counterpart. We see one brief fight moment where she rocks it, but otherwise she doesn’t seem enamoured of the physical realm. The Voice is her specialty, a kind of mind control. She’s going to be either Heart or Head.

I want to say Heart, partly because this Paul is a Four. They really feel like two people against the world, against any of the worlds. Beyond her depth of feeling, though, Jessica doesn’t give us much to work with. Any number can be a devoted mother. When she suggests that Paul needs to go off-world rather than finish the Atreides mission on Arrakis, however, she shows that the personal is more important to her than the political. This would also explain why she births a son, going against the Bene Gesserit plan.

And now I want to say a Six. It’s her sense of duty, of putting Paul in danger with the gom jabbar, even though it’s the last thing she wants to do. Her thinking is black and white: she’ll break the rules for a son, and then follow the rules for the Reverend Mother. Worry, more than any other emotion, consumes her. It’s the fear that Ferguson plays (despite the litany!) that leads me to Six.

PAUL ATREIDES (2021), FOUR

Over a year ago I speculated about Paul in general, specifically using Kyle MacLachlan’s portrayal. The Villeneuve Dune was releasing screenshots, jazzing up interest at that time. Then Covid hit and all productions and release dates slid. Now, though, it’s finally here and I’ve seen it. So, who is this version of Paul?

Well, he’s not a Nine, that’s for sure, lol. Chalomet’s Paul is more intense, more angry, more disturbed by visions. Whoa, Four? Isn’t that interesting! He’s a trained fighter but doesn’t have a love for it. He’s interested in the politics of Arrakis — “desert power”, as Leto says — but only because the Fremen culture captivates him. He disdains playing The Game. The Emperor and the Bene Gesserit, the levers of this universe, barely register for him.

And isn’t it curious that his visions of Chani mostly involve emotion? In reality when they meet, she’s impersonal and businesslike, helping him prepare for what she considers his inevitable death. Paul’s inner world is colored by connections: to Chani, his mother, and especially Duncan. It’s a Heart Type relationship. He spends much of the movie in quiet torment.

This Paul is no diplomat, as a Nine would be. He’s a vengeful angel, a conduit for a repressed people, the Fremen. In terms of dramatic potential in future movies, a Four Paul is an excellent choice.

PETER QUILL, TWO

He’s an orphan. As far as he knows, his father is a deadbeat dad (whatever the romantic stories his mom spins) and his mother dies while he’s young. It isn’t until the second Guardians that Quill comes to see Yondu as a father figure. Much of Quill’s character is defined by this. He wants a family, and he’s very forgiving of someone like Rocket, who’s so hard-shelled he can be impossible to know.

I do think that his openness to life, regardless of his childhood loss, is part of his Enneagram. Different numbers would react differently to being an orphan. He’s still so willing to engage and believe in people. When he gets to Ego, he believes a little too much and too easily.

So I want to say Heart Type. His inability to form a plan is a running joke in the Avengers. (Not a Head Type.) He’s physically competent, but it doesn’t define him. (Not a Body Type.) He’s no Three; his luck is too haphazard. And he’s not acerbic enough to be a Four. 

Two. He collects songs, of course.

THE DARKLING, THREE

What happens to a Three who lives for hundreds of years? Even success becomes boring eventually. He, Alina, and Mal are in a love triangle, plotwise and also in the Enneagram. Three to Six to Nine and around again. Strengths and weaknesses rebound back and forth. It’s all slightly inbred and squirmy.

He’s not only respected because his power is so overwhelming. He genuinely works to improve his Grisha army. Although his goal is basically world domination, he wants it for his team, not just for himself. It’s possible he cares for Alina as more than a tool. It’s hard to say; over the years he’s whittled away a lot of human frailty. What’s real and what are sales tactics with him isn’t always clear.

Again, Three. He’s fooled himself along with the rest of society. And the threat that he’ll take over all of civilization is not just a product of his evil power. He has the talent and personality of a Three that make his chance of success genuinely possible. 

WYLAN VAN ECK, TWO

Unless you’ve read the books you won’t know Wylan, but he’s a wonderful character: the regular guy surrounded by the thieves. His outrage or confusion or ignorance stands in for us the audience, and he’s the vehicle for explanations. Over time we see his traumas, and we develop a deeper affection for and understanding of him. Other characters have pain from tragedy: parental death, slavery. His pain is inflicted by his father, and it’s unbelievably cruel.

My first instinct is to place him as a Head Type. He’s not physical, and he’s not socially adept. But wait. What about a Two? He’s incredibly awkward with his father, even before the abuse starts, and the rejection forms a lot of his character. Are these the actions of a tender heart that’s been damaged? Are his bombs a kind of Two collection?

He’s not a Seven. The underworld isn’t intriguing enough to him for that. He’s not worried or hesitant enough to be a Six. And the odds that he’s a Five when Kaz is one are too long. They don’t have the nerdy impersonal relationship Fives would have.

His gentle sweetness, and his perseverance in the face of deep betrayal, lead me to Two. 

JESPER FAHEY, FOUR

He’s tricky because he’s got a secret. A lot of his character is facade of his own making and also of his childhood fears. As a gambling addict he must always present a lie, as any addict will.

Like the rest of the Crows, his show persona matches his book persona. I love the moment in the show when he clutches the goat, it’s so character revealing and clever.

He’s not a strategist. Leave that to Kaz. His is easily socially wounded, so possibly a Heart Type. But he’s also so physically brilliant, so possibly Body. He’s not heroic enough to be an Eight or Nine, and not fastidious enough for a One, though.

Ah, of course, he’s a Four. He’s stylish in his gunplay, lol! The way he masks his gentle heart seems Four-ish, as does his emotional recklessness. He doesn’t really guard his heart, leaving him open to further hurt. Yet he throws himself into relationships and events fearlessly, regardless. Really only a Four is willing to be simultaneously vulnerable and brave with their feelings.

MATTHIAS HELVAR, NINE

If Nina is a Four, Matthias is a Nine. That pull these two numbers share, a conflicted romance, is baked in. We can also see his Nine-ness in his skill: big man. He’s no Grisha, no rogue; he’s pure tank.

He’s basically a Hitler youth who grew up to realize the system he was taught as a child was horribly wrong. To go along unquestioning, seeking the camaraderie of the group and avoiding any conflict of dissent, is Nine. To realize the truth, to reexamine his principles, is also Nine. One of the only things that will move a Nine to battle is justice. 

He’s written as stodgy and dense — a bit of a Buzz Lightyear. The joke’s often on him. Underneath, though, he’s a hero in a very traditional sense. He’ll never be the protagonist, as is common for a Nine, yet he has those traits. I think the author could’ve leaned in a little stronger on that aspect. His physicality is given its due, but his innate bravery is turned into comic relief a little too often for my comfort.

NINA ZENIK, FOUR

She’s a Four. This is a character who shouts her Enneagram number to the world.

Her passions are large and out in the open. Everyone feels her joie de vivre. She also has that Four stubbornness — remember, for a Four each day has a 50/50 chance to be terrible, so they aren’t dominated by bad times — that we can see when she’s caged in the ship’s hold. She’s a survivor, even through the worst that life offers.

I have a difficult time with Nina in both the show and the books. Her character is fine, but her romance with her captor is deeply problematic. This is a man from a culture that kills her people, a culture that has imprisoned her for being grisha, and she has every expectation that when the ship reaches port she’ll be tortured and put on trial with no hope of reprieve. She can come to see the good in Matthias, that he, too, is a victim of a culture that raised him from boyhood to hate her kind, but not as quickly as she does. The whole relationship is too fast, and it taints my impression of her character. It’s a shame, because she’s brave and loyal. There’s a lot of heroism in Nina, but it’s buried by this cringe-inducing rush to romance.